tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post9167391863524592257..comments2023-11-03T08:22:37.180-07:00Comments on The Commodified by Craig David Long: New Years Eve ControversyThe Commodifiedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13738168613826844328noreply@blogger.comBlogger36125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-52161971003275105332009-06-14T20:14:15.690-07:002009-06-14T20:14:15.690-07:00The photo is not exploitive. The young woman is pa...The photo is not exploitive. The young woman is partying in the DTES and decided to have some fun with the locals. It appears that the man has no problem with the photo.<br /><br />The truth is that the DTES has become a strange mix of the poor and addicted and the rich and beautiful. It's a horrible contrast that symbolizes the many problems our society is coping with.<br /><br />The photo in itself is not the problem. There's nothing wrong with two worlds coming together for a photo, and there's nothing wrong with a little fun. If this photo had been taken as the man was injecting drugs or passed out, then it might have been exploitive, but again, he doesn't seem to have a problem with it.<br /><br />The real problem is, why are young hipsters partying in a drug ghetto? <br /><br />There are a lot of reasons why hipsters are drawn/been pushed into the DTES. But the fact that they don't have a problem with the bigger social problem is disturbing. Coming into the ghetto and partying amongst such misery without doing something to help the neighbourhood and locals is exploitive and disrespectful. <br /><br />So, while the photo may have all been in good fun, the two people go back to completely different homes and have completely different nights and lives and nothing is done about any of this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-77289818489156389612008-04-02T20:08:00.000-07:002008-04-02T20:08:00.000-07:00I think it's fricken halarious. Come one people, s...I think it's fricken halarious. Come one people, she didn't spit on him or anything. And she didn't look the other direct and jog past him, like i'm sure most of you would. And that girls definately got balls.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-19220169694110031572008-03-02T20:34:00.000-08:002008-03-02T20:34:00.000-08:00This picture digusts me.It was taken to show what ...This picture digusts me.<BR/>It was taken to show what the "twat" was wearing<BR/>but instead of her posing alone<BR/>she stood with a homeless man.<BR/>She may deny that she was mocking<BR/>him but look at the carefully at<BR/>her expression, clearly she thought<BR/>it was funny to stand beside a poor homeless man.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-11159741617753342132008-02-20T21:33:00.000-08:002008-02-20T21:33:00.000-08:00yuck. exploitative.yuck. exploitative.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-19412172320511008322008-02-10T14:36:00.000-08:002008-02-10T14:36:00.000-08:00you totally shoulda just gone with some "in return...you totally shoulda just gone with some "in return for posing in our photo, we bought this starving man pizza"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-38187277394567805882008-02-07T10:46:00.000-08:002008-02-07T10:46:00.000-08:00typ.ic.al. vancouver.seriously. i want to vomit a ...typ.ic.al. vancouver.<BR/>seriously. i want to vomit a little that I'M even commenting on this.<BR/><BR/>ps. i love how the "issue" was waved away with the lacroix.<BR/><BR/>again. typ.ic.al. vancouver.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-23222396965024687632008-01-23T11:31:00.000-08:002008-01-23T11:31:00.000-08:00ps. More offensive to me than the photo was the "H...ps. More offensive to me than the photo was the "Happy New Year's from Vancouver's DTES," when the photos less than accurately represented the DTES and sounds kind of trite.<BR/><BR/>I still like this blog, and I still support a medium that allows such controversey and debate--we all need to be made to think a little more.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-72406548066897222972008-01-23T11:22:00.000-08:002008-01-23T11:22:00.000-08:00As art, I think this photo works very well--look a...As art, I think this photo works very well--look at all the discussion that has arisen. The fact that it is posted on a fashion blog whose consumers have money, time, computers, and large vocabularies is problematic from a sociological standpoint, but I agree that the "kid-gloves approach" can be much more damaging; it is certainly disempowering.<BR/><BR/>This photo is important because it asks us to question our own values. Would you rather a photo of the girl alone so that you can bash her "sirens style" without thinking twice? The Commodified not only critiques (clothing) art, but also exists itself as art (photographs). As an outlet, then, for the contributors' art, it follows logically that they would post a photo that probably captivated their interests as much as it has ours. The photo is interesting--just not in the way we expect from fashion blogs, which are usually more about aesthetics and less about social (justice) issues.<BR/><BR/>Would you feel the same outrage if this photo was displayed in an exhibit about exploitation and marginalization? I think the photo's placement on a style blog is less than ideal, but I am glad it was posted, because otherwise, I would never get to see it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-89255068955236850272008-01-15T23:55:00.000-08:002008-01-15T23:55:00.000-08:00If both parties consented to the photo and therefo...If both parties consented to the photo and therefore are willing to have their photo taken, what is the problem?<BR/><BR/>I empathize with the blogger's response, but I wonder if the person is more bothered by the woman's outfit than the juxtaposition of individuals? Would she be upset if she was wearing a black turtleneck and jeans? Or a polyester sweatshirt and nylon trackpants?<BR/><BR/>If the photographer is capturing the early adaptors of Vancouver's street style, how is this photo offensive? How does she reconcile that this photo maybe capturing the early signs of gentrification of Vancouver's downtown eastside, where the humble local residents are increasingly rubbing shoulders of Vancouver's affluent?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-79984317041288092382008-01-14T14:18:00.000-08:002008-01-14T14:18:00.000-08:00Yeah, what does all that Lacroix bullshit have to ...Yeah, what does all that Lacroix bullshit have to do with anything? <BR/>Photographer's are supposed to be documenting their world- did you set up this situation? Did it just happen?LDFhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02258628869853311037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-81418888670394286662008-01-14T11:26:00.000-08:002008-01-14T11:26:00.000-08:00"Art has the ability to retrieve emotions and conj..."Art has the ability to retrieve emotions and conjure an array of perspectives both negative and positive"...<BR/><BR/>Despite my mixed feelings about this image I'm glad it was taken and posted, as it has helped bring to light some very important issues, namely the impoverished and how we percieve them in our society.<BR/><BR/>Homelessness is more of a social issue then a political one...so let's lighten up and have some compassion for oue fellow man.<BR/><BR/>I am a local eco-friendly fashion designer. My work space is located by Hastings and my heart goes out to the residents in this area everyday. Everyone has a story to tell...as long as you are willing to hear it.<BR/><BR/>Thanks...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-60401763132871018452008-01-12T23:41:00.000-08:002008-01-12T23:41:00.000-08:00Well I will have to say the pretension in this dis...Well I will have to say the pretension in this discussion blows my mind and I have been a bit hesitant to defend myself but there are a few uneducated statements that I think should be straightened out <BR/>. one this man was not a prop just a man that wanted to be in a photo I wouldn’t call him a homeless man a prop or anything to point fun at he was actually quite a witty kind man enjoying a piece of pizza and a party on new years eve just like the rest of us he was quite enthused to be in the picture and have a conversation while maybe enjoying a pack of cigarettes I gave him later on instead of standing off to the side and being ignored by people like you whose first thought when you see him is homeless and not worthy to be photographed <BR/>.Two this is a great 80s prom dress that a friend of mine found in a little vintage store made by Alfred Angelo and I think it was well suited for the occasion nothing about that night was less than excess which brings me to <BR/>.Three if we are going to talk about exploitation I'm surprised no one has pointed out the fact that I myself have been a bit exploited I am certainly not a celebrity or anyone who has some title to withhold so where is the just in me being posted in a forum for strangers to manipulate judge and tear me apart I agreed to have my picture taken yes I did not however agree to be in a blog to be picked apart as a human being <BR/>.Four this is a fashion website lets stick to that not how drunk I may have been not a blog about how much money this man has in his pocket so I feel a bit embarrassed that I should have to defend my moral values or worthiness of being called a “twat” all that should be defended is as I stated earlier “a great dress” belittled by being labeled as a mass produced corporation “Sirens” dress anyways I could go on to ten about all the wrong comments made but four is already a foolish amount of energy put into defending this photograph that was a spur of the moment thing<BR/>P.S he was blinking not out of itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-6857899242646271862008-01-10T16:29:00.000-08:002008-01-10T16:29:00.000-08:001) How do we know he's homeless?2) Why are we able...1) How do we know he's homeless?<BR/>2) Why are we able to take it upon ourselves to know that this man is being "exploited"? Because we have money, educations and status? If this guy says he's being exploited, then he is. Without that assertion, his consent to the photograph says the only thing that is offended is some of our overly-liberal sensibilities.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-3038557425744762152008-01-10T15:50:00.000-08:002008-01-10T15:50:00.000-08:00Are they related? Their mouths look very similar.Are they related? Their mouths look very similar.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-44085246815180076172008-01-10T12:20:00.000-08:002008-01-10T12:20:00.000-08:00Wow.Wow.Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03874196441496831678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-22562452824667537552008-01-10T11:11:00.000-08:002008-01-10T11:11:00.000-08:00demiCouture.ca is a hypocrite for calling that gir...demiCouture.ca is a hypocrite for calling that girl a "twat" How can we believe you have respect for the supposedly homeless when you call people things like that? furthermore call down your own vagina using that word!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-15231688837315104892008-01-08T10:33:00.000-08:002008-01-08T10:33:00.000-08:00the imaginations on some people... yes the fact th...the imaginations on some people... yes the fact that a blond girl is wearing a short pink "fun" party dress must imply that she hit people in the face on the dance floor and spilled drinks on their feet. yes thats the natural conclusion from this photograph. or how about calling her a "twat"? i know i like being referred to as a slang for a sexual organ all the time! oh and of course he must be homeless! he's drunk! ignore those clean clothes he's wearing!<BR/><BR/>why is their something about fashion writing that makes people think it acceptable to file their claws into a point and scrape out each others eyes? interplaced with moments of sanctimonious intellectual BS? it really takes all the steam out of a persons argument when they throw in constructed slander about real individuals. please remember this is not a jeff wall photograph. these are not actors being paid to pose. these are not celebrities. this is too complex an image to focus on merely the two people concerned. <BR/>how about the gentrification of gastown? or about the insanely high rents that this city dishes out that make it impossible for art and young culture to exist anywhere else?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-2651997999118376402008-01-08T08:09:00.000-08:002008-01-08T08:09:00.000-08:00I am shocked by those comments that obviously show...I am shocked by those comments that obviously show very little or no understanding of why people find this picture offensive. Its not about whether or not the homeless picture is worse off due to this picture being taken. Because of course he isnt. It is about what this picture SYMBOLIZES.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-4539781071310220062008-01-07T22:32:00.000-08:002008-01-07T22:32:00.000-08:00I like your blog, but it's a stretch to delve into...I like your blog, but it's a stretch to delve into some long-winded tangent about Lacroix and this picture being some kind of social commentary. If your intentions were to truly make some sort of social critique, then why would you choose the "excess of the 80's" as your talking-point when that's a completely tired and irrelevant topic of discussion in regards to the DTES (unless you just read Bret Easton Ellis for the first time or some shit)? I think you're reaching here, Craig. You took a tasteless picture and posted it, simple as that. You could even chalk it up to being drunk and hungover the next day... I mean we all exercise poor judgment sometimes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-36203945984377691712008-01-07T20:36:00.000-08:002008-01-07T20:36:00.000-08:00holy crap people, I find your sanctimony painful. ...holy crap people, I find your sanctimony painful. He's wasted and it's new year's eve. Homeless, perhaps. Different than about 90% of the people out past midnight on new year's. No. I think the "protect the homeless" attitude is more disrespectful than the cheeky pose. I think the guy in the photo might very well think the same. 80's prom dress, drunken night out, and 2008 here we come. Please, let go of your self-righteousness and go talk to some people who may be living in less than ideal conditions. They'll probably tell you the kid glove approach is more disrespectful than accepting them for where they're at and how they live.gasphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17911297225709453197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-86388762488004481532008-01-07T16:55:00.000-08:002008-01-07T16:55:00.000-08:00I really like his Nike hoodie and CAT hat a very a...I really like his Nike hoodie and CAT hat a very athletic inspired look.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-84650965206583560072008-01-07T16:49:00.000-08:002008-01-07T16:49:00.000-08:00I think the idea is that when you live in a city w...I think the idea is that when you live in a city where far too many people don't even have the good fortune of a home which most of us take for granted, it's at best a bit unseemly to be taking pictures of the homeless when the subject is something as frivolous as fashion. It's not like the photo is a part of a project to address the problems of the downtown eastside, it's a piece of fashion commentary, which is a fine subject, but not one that I think we should be employing people who don't have the wealth and time to be concerned about fashion to promote. No one is justifiably saying we should ignore this man, or anyone else, but that when we do pay attention to people it should be in a way that reflects their dignity. I don't know about you, but when I look at this photo, dignified is not one of the words that comes to my mind to describe it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-56155679273944272872008-01-07T15:53:00.000-08:002008-01-07T15:53:00.000-08:00looks like something Jeff Wall would have done. I...looks like something Jeff Wall would have done. <BR/><BR/>I enjoy it more than his work because it doesn't seem set up. They both seem genuine, whether they now it or not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-67955113997732747702008-01-07T11:18:00.000-08:002008-01-07T11:18:00.000-08:00Let us not take ourselves to seriously people. All...Let us not take ourselves to seriously people. All points made are valid, however… I don’t think fashion is meant to be taken so literally, or as some sort of moral compass. This is very similar to blaming eating disorders on the fashion industry. Fashion does not determine the fate of our society. The people wearing the clothing do!!!<BR/>I would also like to reference Jean-Paul Gaultier's fascination with street style (street kids, squeegees…) Are we going to start saying that J-P is mocking them? I think we should spend less time verbally masturbating or pointing fingers, and put things into prospective. Quel horreur!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32035394.post-17909850278428299682008-01-06T23:15:00.000-08:002008-01-06T23:15:00.000-08:00Okay. Okay.Settle down here people.The point is I ...Okay. Okay.<BR/>Settle down here people.<BR/><BR/>The point is I would sleep with both of them.<BR/>And I have.<BR/>It was great - with lots of bodily fluids pleasurably shivered and slathered back and forth.<BR/>But...<BR/>I preferred banging one over the other. <BR/><BR/>Why?<BR/>Well that brings up the "oh so controversial" scoring mechanism...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com